| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
61. The long reach of James 315's New Order - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Tesal wrote: My advice is to stay in Hi-sec where you pathetic excuse for a pvper belong. confirming k/d ratio is of utmost importance, and we are all pathetic excuses for pvpers. (at least miners undock lol)
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.03.26 06:25:00
|
62. Collective front launched against the New Order, James315 and miner bumping. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Katran Luftschreck wrote: And sooner or later someone is going to take that list of yours and go after exactly those miners. What happens then, besides the hilarity in knowing that they wasted their money, you're "protection" service offers n...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.03.22 00:34:00
|
63. Should Ganking be profitable? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Whitehound wrote: Mallak Azaria wrote: Anyone who supports isk tanking probably shouldn't be working for CCP right now. ISK tanking is fine. If it was nonsense then Titans should not cost billions and yet we find the cost factor makes comp...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.03.21 14:00:00
|
64. The long reach of James 315's New Order - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Hazzim wrote: So in light of you advocacy of increased risk to high-sec dwellers then I advocate an increased risk to high-sec gankers. Here's the thing though - you don't seem to be advocating increased risk, it's more along the lines of in...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.03.21 09:05:00
|
65. Collective front launched against the New Order, James315 and miner bumping. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Katran Luftschreck wrote: Ha! What part of "Tank" and "ECM" did you not read? Millions for defense, but not one ISK for tribute. May all Code-compliant miners follow your example, remaining at their keyboards at all times, vigilantly guar...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.03.20 13:29:00
|
66. Suggesting James 315 as the Highsec representative for CSM 8 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Asuri Kinnes wrote: Tippia proved several times, in several different threads, why statements like yours are wrong (i.e. - alts). Where the characters are has no provable relation to where the players are (or self identify). As we *all* know, p...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.03.20 06:14:00
|
67. Should Ganking be profitable? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Whitehound wrote: Just because something is PvP does not automatically make it good PvP. It is the dumbest thing one can do just after hating PvP itself. It is important to ask for the reasons why a play style exists and to see why it is good a...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.03.19 23:21:00
|
68. Should Ganking be profitable? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Whitehound wrote: Sure, point taken, but you are wrong about it, because there are more profitable and less interactive play styles. You then cannot kick miners out of the game, because you need the minerals, but you can well kick gankers out o...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.03.19 22:18:00
|
69. Should Ganking be profitable? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Whitehound wrote: Shooting a ship for its modules should not be like shaking an apple tree for catching falling apples. I am thinking modules need to drop damaged, ranging from utterly broken to heavily damaged, because this makes sense. Furthe...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.03.19 13:56:00
|
70. The long reach of James 315's New Order - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Hazzim wrote: Crying out how high-sec is generating too much isk. Safe to say game mechanics allows that to happen, and your ability to negate that effect pisses you off and turn to CCP for game mechanics to be change to ensure null-sec dominan...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.03.19 01:20:00
|
71. Collective front launched against the New Order, James315 and miner bumping. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Katran Luftschreck wrote: FTFY. Real simple people: 1) Don't mine ice. 2) Tank. 3) ECM. 4) Ignore. I thought you opposed the New Order. Thanks for your support!
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.03.18 22:36:00
|
72. Is High Sec a Mith? - in Live Events Discussion [original thread]
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote: Take away the profit and you remove 90% of the problem. "It"'s not a problem.
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.03.18 13:55:00
|
73. Seemingly Mindless Pvp: Any Relevant Point? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Just come back in a vexor or something and pop his tengu with gate guns...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.03.18 09:41:00
|
74. The long reach of James 315's New Order - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Lainalil wrote: Maybe you are far reaching, perhaps you've changed the price of mackinaws across all of empire space by about 150isk. YOU HAVE CHANGED EMPIRE SPACE! Follow our Knights for a while, and see for yourself the changes we have wro...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.03.18 06:57:00
|
75. The long reach of James 315's New Order - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Hazzim wrote: What i meant by that was a persona-non grata would not be allowed to enter specific empire space without getting podded at the first sign of Concord and empire navies albeit temporarily similar to a jail sentence. Cant leave stati...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.03.18 06:27:00
|
76. The long reach of James 315's New Order - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Hazzim wrote: Wants real life sand box, gets real life rules. Real life the ultimate sand box. EVE is real, I was there. PS. Tornado alts can be done with <900k SP - concord can pod away, couldn't care less.
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.03.18 03:24:00
|
77. Sending high sec miners back to null - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Georgina Parmala wrote: Dave Stark wrote: you don't even need to make it that complicated. null sec grav sites, as a whole, are worth less isk/m3 than scordite even when factoring in rorq vs orca bonuses. As true as that is, it really blo...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.03.17 09:37:00
|
78. A Tale of Two Sandboxes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Katran Luftschreck wrote: In the end your average corp-thief/AWOXER doesn't give a crap about the ISK or even the items themselves. They just want to be hurtful little turds in a video game because in video games people can't pound their RL fac...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.03.15 11:21:00
|
79. The difference between a carebear and an EVE industrialist - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Katran Luftschreck wrote: Application rejected. Application rejected. Application rejected. Sorry, Goonswarm doesn't want you - you're too big of an a-hole for our standards. Back to the carebare NPC corp for you forever. Arrogant -10.0 going i...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.03.14 10:43:00
|
80. Trebor Daehdoow for CSM8 - The Proven Performer - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
mynnna wrote: Lin Suizei wrote: We aren't asking for a pledge on CCP's actions, and the side effects of them. We are asking Trebor to say, once and for all, whether he does or does not support the Trammelisation of highsec. Such a narro...
- by Lin Suizei - at 2013.03.14 07:26:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |